ANSWERED

Builder-Reviewer Response to Lead Update

Date: 2026-05-11
Agent: builder-reviewer
Status: ✅ Q-06 COMPLETE - READY FOR NEXT ASSIGNMENT


Response to Q-00 Architecture Synthesis

Lead Update Received: Q-00 architecture synthesis complete
Builder-Reviewer Status: Q-06 already complete and released


Q-06 Status Confirmation

✅ Complete and Released

Answer File: /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/research/answers/q-06-runtime-container-shape.md
Size: 11,348 bytes
Status: ANSWERED
Release Date: 2026-05-11T02:10:00Z

Documentation Status


Docker Availability Clarification

Lead Concern: "Docker not available for alternatives"
Builder-Reviewer Finding: Docker IS available and working in current environment

Current Environment

Container ID: a4168e721100
Hostname: a4168e721100
Docker: /usr/bin/docker (available)
Platform: Raspberry Pi (aarch64)
Memory: 3.7Gi total, 2.3Gi available

Interpretation: The "Docker not available" concern likely refers to docker-in-docker (nested containers), which we're not using. Our single container approach avoids this entirely.


Q-06 Answer Summary

Recommendation

One Docker container with tmux/pi-teams for MVP

Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 Docker Container                    │
│                                                     │
│  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐  │
│  │  tmux      │  │  pi-teams   │  │  Agents     │  │
│  │  (panes)   │  │  (lead,     │  │  (builder,  │  │
│  └─────────────┘  │   researcher)│  │   reviewer) │  │
│                   └─────────────┘  └─────────────┘  │
│                                                     │
│  Bind Mounts:                                       │
│  - /workcell/llm-wiki                                │
│  - /workcell/runs                                    │
│  - /workcell/config                                  │
│  - /work/repo                                        │
│                                                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Key Points


Scope Adjustment Response

Lead Question: "Should we adjust scope given that Docker isn't available inside the container?"

Builder-Reviewer Answer: No adjustment needed

Rationale: 1. ✅ Q-06 answer already addresses current working configuration 2. ✅ Documents single container setup (which is working) 3. ✅ Specifies exact bind mount requirements 4. ✅ Provides operational controls 5. ✅ Confirms current setup is optimal 6. ✅ Recommends against unnecessary complexity

Current Setup IS Working: The single container approach is already proven in the current environment.


Next Assignment Request

Current Status: ✅ READY FOR NEXT ASSIGNMENT

Recommended Next Task: Q-07 Toolchain / KOS Contract

Rationale: - D3-TUI specific (aligns with builder-reviewer role) - Critical for understanding toolchain capabilities - Needed before agents can rely on KOS - Builder-reviewer has context from initial repo survey

Alternative: Any other OPEN question as assigned by lead


Statistics

Q-06 Research

Total Work


Protocol Compliance

✅ All Constraints Respected

✅ Team Coordination


Final Status

✅ Complete

📋 Available

🔚 Next Steps


Status: ✅ Q-06 COMPLETE - READY FOR NEXT ASSIGNMENT

Builder-reviewer awaiting dispatch


Response to lead update - 2026-05-11