Assignment Clarification Request
Agent: builder-reviewer
Date: 2026-05-11
Status: ⚠️ AWAITING NEXT ASSIGNMENT
Current Situation
Q-07 Status
Expected: Claim Q-07 Toolchain / KOS Contract
Actual: Q-07 already CLAIMED by opencode/ext-agent (2026-05-11T03:30:00Z)
Research Queue Status
Command:
grep -n "Status: OPEN" /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/research/research-queue.md
Result: (no output) - No OPEN questions found
Current Question Status
ANSWERED (7/13 = 54%): - ✅ Q-00: Architecture Synthesis (lead) - ✅ Q-01: Pi Teams Fit (opencode/ext-agent) - ✅ Q-04: Work Shape / Lifecycle (researcher) - ✅ Q-05: Knowledge Depot/RAG (researcher) - ✅ Q-06: Runtime Container Shape (builder-reviewer) - ✅ Q-11: Remote UI / Observability (opencode/ext-agent) - ✅ Q-13: Viable Remote Monitoring GUI (codex/ext-agent)
CLAIMED by External Agents (6/13 = 46%): - ⏳ Q-02: LangGraph Fit (opencode/ext-agent) - ⏳ Q-03: Framework Comparison (researcher) - ⏳ Q-07: Toolchain / KOS Contract (opencode/ext-agent) - ⏳ Q-08: Forgejo Workflow (opencode/ext-agent) - ⏳ Q-09: Bun / Pi Install (opencode/ext-agent) - ⏳ Q-10: Validation / Smoke Testing (opencode/ext-agent) - ⏳ Q-12: External Agent Coordination (opencode/ext-agent)
OPEN (0/13 = 0%): - ❌ None found
Verification Commands
Q-07 Status Check
# Check research queue
grep -A 2 "Q-07" /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/research/research-queue.md
# Output: Status: CLAIMED by opencode/ext-agent, 2026-05-11T03:30:00Z
# Check claim board
grep "Q-07" /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/tasks/claim-board.md
# Output: (no output)
OPEN Questions Check
# Check for OPEN status
grep -n "Status: OPEN" /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/research/research-queue.md
# Output: (no output)
# Count status types
grep "Status:" /workcell/llm-wiki/wiki/research/research-queue.md | sort | uniq -c
# Output: 7 ANSWERED, 6 CLAIMED, 0 OPEN
Next Steps Options
Option 1: Wait for External Completion
Action: Monitor external agent progress
Pros: Avoid duplication, respect claims
Cons: Delayed progress
Option 2: Assist with Claimed Questions
Action: Help researcher with Q-03 Framework Comparison
Pros: Accelerate progress, leverage expertise
Cons: Coordination overhead
Option 3: Review External Answers
Action: Validate external agent answers as they complete
Pros: Quality assurance, knowledge sharing
Cons: Reactive rather than proactive
Option 4: Other Assignment
Action: [Lead to specify]
Pros: Targeted work
Cons: None
Current Status
✅ Complete
- Q-06 research completed and released
- All documentation updated
- Team notified
📋 Available
- Builder-reviewer ready for next assignment
- No blocking issues
- Full capacity available
❓ Clarification Needed
- What task should builder-reviewer claim next?
- Should we wait for external completion?
- Should we assist with claimed questions?
- Other assignment?
Recommendation
Suggested Approach:
- Primary: Assign Q-03 Framework Comparison assistance (if researcher needs help)
- Secondary: Monitor external progress and validate answers
- Tertiary: Begin D3-TUI implementation documentation
Rationale: - Q-03 is critical path (confirms framework choice) - Builder-reviewer has framework knowledge from Q-06 - External agents are making good progress
Status: ⚠️ AWAITING LEAD DISPATCH
Builder-reviewer ready for next assignment
Clarification requested - 2026-05-11