Status Summary: 20260511-T001 Asset Extraction Readiness

Last Updated: 2026-05-11T01:45:00Z
Task Status: IN PROGRESS (T1 Review/Research)
Lead: lead
Team: d3-tui-triad

Current State

Protocol Status

• ✅ Researcher has acknowledged task clock with comprehensive feedback
• ⏳ Builder-reviewer has read messages but not yet responded
• ❌ BLOCKED: Cannot proceed to T2 without builder-reviewer acknowledgment per protocol

Task Progress

• ✅ T0 Intake: Complete (repo inspection, claim board check, findings report)
• ✅ T1 Research: Complete (researcher work done, comprehensive analysis)
• ❌ T2 Design: Blocked (waiting for acknowledgment)
• ❌ T3 Implementation: Blocked (waiting for T2 completion)

Deliverables Created

1. T0 Findings: /workcell/llm-wiki/runs/20260511-t001/t0-findings.md
2. T1 Research: /workcell/llm-wiki/runs/20260511-t001/t1-research-findings.md
3. T2 Design: /workcell/llm-wiki/runs/20260511-t001/t2-design.md
4. Task Clock: /workcell/llm-wiki/runs/20260511-t001/task-clock-corrected.md

Blockers

1. Protocol Blocker (HIGH PRIORITY)

Issue: Per AGENT_PROTOCOL.md: "No implementation begins until lead writes the T0-T3 plan and all agents acknowledge it."

Status: - ✅ Researcher acknowledged - ⏳ Builder-reviewer acknowledgment pending - ❌ Cannot proceed to T2 without full team acknowledgment

Impact: Task is blocked until builder-reviewer responds

2. Environmental Blocker (MEDIUM PRIORITY)

Issue: Python runtime missing from environment

Discovered by: team-lead

Impact: - Extraction tool improvements cannot be validated - --dry-run mode testing blocked - Discovery mode enhancements cannot be tested

Options: - A) Proceed with documentation-only improvements (no Python required) - B) Add Python installation as prerequisite task - C) Adjust scope to avoid Python-dependent work

3. Decision Blocker (MEDIUM PRIORITY)

Issue: Need team agreement on how to handle environmental constraints

Questions for Team: 1. Should we proceed with documentation improvements that don't require Python? 2. Should we split the task into Python-installation + doc/tooling work? 3. Should we adjust scope to focus only on documentation?

Researcher Work Summary

Completed Research

• ✅ Historical evidence analysis (stage-briefs, gap analysis)
• ✅ Tooling capabilities assessment (3 pixel formats, 3 data formats supported)
• ✅ Error handling gaps identified (4 major issues)
• ✅ Documentation gaps identified (4 missing guides)
• ✅ Manifest improvement recommendations (4 enhancements)

Researcher Recommendations

1. High-Priority Enhancements:
2. --dry-run mode for manifest validation
3. Improved error messages with actionable solutions
4. Manifest comparison feature

5. Better discovery output

6. Documentation Needs:

7. docs/ASSET_EXTRACTION_WORKFLOW.md (step-by-step guide)
8. Update README.md (asset requirements)
9. Update BUILD.md (troubleshooting)

10. Update ASSET_EXTRACTION_MAP.md (workflow examples)

11. Manifest Improvements:

12. Add validation_status field
13. Add confidence score
14. Add source tracking
15. Add schema validation

Builder-Reviewer Considerations

Scope Review

The proposed task scope respects builder constraints: - ✅ Documentation/tooling focus (no source file changes yet) - ✅ No licensed content handling - ✅ Existing build continues to work - ✅ Aligns with "when validation is blocked" guidance

Builder-Specific Questions

1. Are there any additional builder constraints for this task?
2. Does the scope appropriately balance documentation vs. tooling?
3. Should we prioritize any specific aspect of the work?
4. How should we handle the Python toolchain blocker?

Risk Assessment

• Low Risk: Documentation improvements, error handling, manifest clarity
• Medium Risk: Tooling changes (Python dependency, testing needed)
• High Risk (Avoided): No licensed content, no build system changes

Next Steps (Pending Acknowledgment)

Once Builder-Reviewer Acknowledges:

1. Finalize task clock with any builder constraints
2. Decide on Python blocker resolution strategy
3. Proceed to T2 Design phase
4. Implement documentation improvements
5. Test improvements that don't require Python

Immediate Actions:

• ✅ Lead: Corrected protocol violation, created comprehensive documentation
• ✅ Researcher: Completed T1 research, provided detailed recommendations
• ⏳ Builder-Reviewer: Review and acknowledge task clock
• ⏳ Team: Decide on Python blocker resolution

Timeline

• Task Claimed: 2026-05-11T01:45:00Z
• Current Time: 2026-05-11T01:45:18Z
• Lease Duration: 90 minutes (expires 2026-05-11T03:15:00Z)
• Time Elapsed: <1 minute
• Time Remaining: ~89 minutes

Protocol Compliance Checklist

• [x] Lead created task clock with detailed scope
• [x] Researcher reviewed and provided feedback
• [ ] Builder-reviewer acknowledgment (PENDING)
• [ ] All agents acknowledge T0-T3 plan (PENDING)
• [ ] No implementation without acknowledgment (COMPLIANT)

Summary

The task is in a clean, well-documented state but blocked on protocol requirements. All research work is complete, comprehensive documentation exists, and the team has clear options for proceeding once builder-reviewer provides acknowledgment and we resolve the Python toolchain issue.

Current Priority: Obtain builder-reviewer acknowledgment to unblock task progression per AGENT_PROTOCOL.md requirements.